How we get the numbers

Everything here comes from public data, through open code, with the rule for each verdict written before looking at the result.

Where the data comes from

How a claim becomes a verdict

Claims are tested in batches. Each batch's list, the measure for each claim and the effect size it would need are written before running. Every claim on the list is published below, including the ones that came to nothing.

Each claim gets one effect and a 95% interval, from resampling matches. When the question is "is this beyond chance?", the reference is a range of World Cups drawn at random from the history.

True
the interval sits above zero and both halves of the history (1986-2002 and 2006-2026) point the same way.
True, borderline
as True, but the 99% interval reaches zero.
Myth
the whole interval sits below the smallest effect the claim implies.
Can't tell
neither: the data is not enough.

Every claim tested

Two batches, of 12 and 11 claims. Those on the site link to their page; the rest say why they were left out.

Batch 1

  1. MythThe first goal is worth more in the knockout.Not on the site: a small gap and a confusing reading (winning at 90 or going through).
  2. Myth2-0 is the most dangerous lead.
  3. Can't tellThe worst time to concede is just before half-time.Not on the site: inconclusive.
  4. Can't tellA late equalizer wins you extra time.Not on the site: inconclusive, with only 37 cases.
  5. MythA team is vulnerable right after scoring.Not on the site: a weak effect, and the two halves of the history disagree.
  6. MythA team leading by one sits back.
  7. MythGoals come in clusters.Not on the site: the result hinges on explaining the restart after a goal.
  8. Myth, borderlineKnockout teams play for the draw.Not on the site: an ambiguous message.
  9. Partly true2026 was an outlier World Cup.On the site as "What was new in 2026".
  10. MythFootball has become tighter.Not on the site: it depended on the roller-coaster claim, which was not published.
  11. MythSome teams are specialists in deciding late.
  12. True, borderlineLose the opener and you are out (and the 48-team format eased it).

Batch 2

  1. Can't tellPenalties are a lottery.Not on the site: the favorite wins just over half of shootouts, too close to 50% to call.
  2. Can't tellKicking first in a shootout is an advantage.Not on the site: inconclusive.
  3. MythAt the World Cup, the favorite struggles in the knockout.
  4. Can't tellThe World Cup has become less predictable.Not on the site: inconclusive.
  5. True, borderline2026's big wins came from weaker teams.Not on the site: strength explains little of the jump; it appears as a caveat in "What was new in 2026".
  6. Can't tellPedigree counts: past champions beat expectations.Not on the site: inconclusive.
  7. TruePlaying at home helps at the World Cup.
  8. MythA team leading by one sits back (controlling for strength).Not on the site: it revises the reading of the batch-1 myth, whose page now says only that there is no sign of sitting back.
  9. TrueInternational football has become more of a roller-coaster.Not on the site: a small effect, measured in matches outside World Cups.
  10. True, borderlineThe kick that must go in trembles.
  11. Can't tellRest decides knockout matches.Not on the site: inconclusive.

Download the data

The tables the site uses, ready to download. Every rate carries how many cases back it up (k of n).

Data for 1986-2022 derived from The Fjelstul World Cup Database © 2023 Joshua C. Fjelstul, Ph.D., licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), available at https://www.github.com/jfjelstul/worldcup. Modifications: only men's World Cups from 1986, reshaped and aggregated by CopaData (https://github.com/stuaninauts/copadata). Data for 2026 from OpenFootball (https://github.com/openfootball/worldcup.json), public domain (CC0). Team strength (Elo) computed from the international results of https://github.com/martj42/international_results, public domain (CC0).

Corrections

Code and decisions

The code, the tests and the record of each decision are in the repository. See on GitHub →